Mesorat%20hashas for Pesachim 144:5

ר' שמעון היא דתניא אחד הזבחים הראויין ואחד זבחים שאינן ראויין וכן השוחט לשם אימורי ציבור פטור דברי ר' מאיר א"ר שמעון לא נחלקו רבי אליעזר ורבי יהושע על שאינן ראויין שחייב על מה נחלקו על הראויין שרבי אליעזר מחייב חטאת ורבי יהושע פוטר

R. Zera and R. Samuel b. Isaac were sitting in the hall of R. Samuel b. Isaac['s house], and they sat and said: R. Simeon b. Lakish said: If a man mistook a spit of nothar for a spit of [ordinary] roast meat and he ate it, he is liable. While R. Johanan said: If a man had intercourse with his wife, a niddah, he is liable; if he had intercourse with his yebamah, a niddah, he is not liable. Some say, In the former case he is all the more liable, seeing that he did not perform a religious duty [at all]. Others say, In the former case he would not be liable. What is the reason? It is only there because he should have asked; but here, that he could not have asked, [he is] not [liable].

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Pesachim 144:5. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.